RESEARCHJune 1, 2026 · 6 min read

Everyone Watches What Congress Buys.
The Real Signal Is What They Sell.

Across 30,000+ STOCK Act trades, congressional purchases lag the market on average — and high-conviction sells were once the most accurate signal we tracked. A July 2026 recalibration cut that claim down to a coin-flip win rate on a much larger sample — but the +4.2% average alpha survived. Here is the thesis, what changed, and why we show both.

UPDATE — July 6, 2026. Our conviction model was recalibrated against realized outcomes (see the methodology), which re-cut every cohort in this post. The high-conviction sell cohort grew from 57 to 199 signals — and its win rate fell from 64.8% to 50.3%. The original headline claim did not survive the larger sample. The 180-day alpha remains positive at +4.20%, second among the strategies we track. The table and text below now reflect the current backtests; we kept the original figures visible in the caveats, because publishing the weakened result matters as much as publishing the strong one. Live values: /research.

The trade nobody screenshots

Congressional buys are a media genre unto themselves — a representative picks up a chip stock and it's a headline by morning. Sells get the opposite treatment: written off as noise. Taxes, rebalancing, tuition, an ethics divestment — there are a dozen boring reasons to sell, so the assumption is that a sale tells you nothing.

We've leaned on that assumption ourselves. In Does Congress Beat the Market? we deliberately excluded sales, calling them liquidity-driven rather than information-driven. On average, across all sales, that's a fair simplification.

But “on average” buries the most interesting thing in the data. Filter for conviction, and the exits start to look a lot smarter than the entrances.

The number

Start with the baseline. Buy every stock Congress bought — all 10,428 purchases — and you'd have trailed the S&P 500 by 2.40% over the following 180 days, with a win rate of just 43%. As a group, Congress is a below-average buyer.

Now flip to the sell side. Isolate high-conviction sells — the ones the conviction model flags on size, speed of disclosure, and relevance — and the picture inverts.

STRATEGYNWR 180D180D ALPHA
High Conviction Sells★ THIS POST
19950.3%+4.20%
Cross-Chamber Bipartisan Buys
50350.7%+6.22%
High Conviction Purchases
65946.7%+1.78%
All Purchases (Baseline)
10,42842.9%-2.40%
The asymmetry, revisited — before recalibration, the sell signal's 64.8% win rate beat every buy strategy. On the recalibrated, 3.5×-larger cohort it wins 50.3% of the time — a coin flip on frequency. What survived is magnitude: +4.20% average alpha, because the underperformance it catches runs deeper than its misses. The edge moved from how often to how much.

What “high conviction” and “a win” actually mean

High conviction isn't every sale. It's the subset the conviction score elevates — meaningful position sizes, fast disclosure rather than a 45-day-late filing, and committee or sector relevance. Routine, small, slow-filed sales don't qualify.

A “win” for a sell signal is scored the opposite of a buy: the signal is right when the stock subsequently underperforms the market. At 50.3%, the current cohort is right about half the time — what keeps it valuable is the payoff asymmetry. The weakness it catches is larger than what its misses give back, which is how a coin-flip hit rate still nets +4.20% average alpha over six months.

Why a sell might say more than a buy

This is the part we can't prove, only reason about — so treat it as hypothesis, not accusation.

1.
Buying is noisy; selling is deliberate.
You can buy a stock for optimism, on an advisor’s nudge, or because it’s in a fund you barely track. Dumping a sized position quickly is a decision, not a default.
2.
The downside is what you actually know.
Information advantages — a stalling bill, a contract that won’t renew, a sector cooling — often show up first as a reason to leave, not a reason to arrive.
3.
Sells don’t get gamed.
Because nobody’s building “follow the congressional sell” portfolios, the signal hasn’t been arbitraged the way the buy-side headlines have.

None of that implies wrongdoing by any individual. It's a statistical pattern in public filings — but it's a pattern worth watching.

The honest caveats

1.
Small sample — and a live lesson in it.
High-conviction sells are rare by construction: 57 signals (trades dated Feb 2023–Oct 2025). The July 2026 recalibration widened the cohort to 199 and the win rate fell from 64.8% to 50.3% — the strong result did not survive the larger sample. We are leaving that on the record: it is the clearest small-n lesson in our own research.
2.
The edge is a 180-day edge.
Like the buy findings, the six-month horizon is where it shows up. Shorter holds capture less of it.
3.
Winsorized.
Alpha is winsorized at ±200% so a single blowup can’t carry the result. Raw numbers run a touch higher and a lot noisier.
4.
Observational.
This is a backtest of public disclosures, not investment advice, and not a claim about anyone’s intent.

The method behind the numbers

Universe30,000+ STOCK Act trade disclosures (House + Senate), refreshed daily.
SignalSales surfaced by the conviction model (size, disclosure speed, relevance), labeled “High Conviction Sells.”
TimingMeasured from the disclosure date — the point a follower could actually have acted.
BenchmarkS&P 500 over the identical 180-day window; a sell “wins” when the stock underperforms it.
OutliersAlpha winsorized at ±200%.

See every strategy side by side — buys and the lone sell signal — on the Research page, watch new high-conviction sells land in the Signal Log, and rank the members behind them on the Leaderboard.

EXPLORE THE DATA YOURSELF

Watch the Exits, Not Just the Entrances.

High-conviction sell signals, conviction-scored trades, and real-time STOCK Act alerts — updated daily from the official filings.

SIGNAL FEED →ALL STRATEGIES →
Published June 1, 2026 · Updated July 6, 2026 following the conviction-model recalibration (cohorts, win rates, and alpha figures revised to the current backtests). This research is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Backtested performance is not indicative of future results. All investments involve risk of loss. Congressional trade disclosures are public information filed under the STOCK Act. Signal Congress is not affiliated with the U.S. Congress or any government agency.
← BACK TO BLOG